Ripp-off with the GDPR
In the past, it was generally about the trade directories, now windy players are trying to exploit the “GDPR panic”. Recently, a hasty fax message from the
DATENSCHUTZ FÜR DIGITALE PRODUKTE UND UNTERNEHMEN
In the past, it was generally about the trade directories, now windy players are trying to exploit the “GDPR panic”. Recently, a hasty fax message from the
Bare in mind when using Google Fonts that Google collects user data in order to compile statistics about the user behaviour for
The CNIL just published their guidelines regarding mobile applications measuring frequency and presence in public spaces. Here the summary of the most relevant points:
What is meant by “other processors” in the Art. 28 (2) GDPR? Are these service suppliers who provide the core product or
Some of you have already received some: inquiries from data subjects who would like to know what personal data your company has stored
Two medium-sized French companies have received warning notices from the CNIL (French data protection authority). Both companies affected – Teemo and Fidzup – collect
The negotiations about the ePrivacy Regulation are postponed by Austrian government during its Presidency of the Council of the European Union. Apparently only little
ePrivacy’s data protection experts have been discussing the question of the necessity of a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) for classic models of the
According to Art. 55 GDPR, each supervisory authority is responsible for its own jurisdiction (territory). In addition, however, the lead supervisory authority (the so-called
At the end of April, the independent data protection authorities of the German federal and state governments (DSK) published a position paper